SIDDHARTHA SANKAR BAIRAGI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/22126/2026 · 2026-10-15
Amrita Sinha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48939 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48939 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
19 15.10.2026 Court No.24 pg. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 22126 of 2026
Siddhartha Sankar Bairagi Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sakti Pada Jana Mr. Subhajyoti Das
… For the Petitioner
Mr. Sanjit Singh
… For the State
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept with the records. 2. The petitioner is a retired Headmaster. He received 3% additional increment in accordance with the Government Notification dated 10th February, 2010 for imparting higher secondary education. The pay of the petitioner was fixed accordingly. 3. At the time of his retirement, the petitioner was directed to refund the amount overdrawn by him in view of the withdrawal of the 2010 notification by the State Government by a subsequent notification dated 22nd March, 2017. 4. Apprehending that he will not get his terminal dues in proper time, the petitioner refunded the amount which was found to be withdrawn by him after 2017. 2
5. The issue of withdrawal of the 2010 notification in the year 2017 was challenged before the Court and the Hon’ble Division Bench on 7th January, 2025 in FMA 981 of 2022 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2022 in the matter of Samarendranath Adak –vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. was pleased to set aside and quash the impugned notification dated 22nd March,
2017. 6. The Hon’ble Division Bench was pleased to hold that the teacher would be entitled to grant of 3% additional increment in terms of ROPA 2009 with effect from the date of appointment as Headmaster/ Headmistress or from the date of upgradation of the school, whichever is earlier. 7. On setting aside of the 2017 notification by which the petitioner was found to be drawing excess amount, the right of the petitioner to receive 3% additional increment in terms of the 2010 notification revived. 8. The instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the District Inspector of Schools (SE), South 24-Parganas to act in terms of the refixation of the pay of the petitioner made on 7th November, 2012 and revised Pension Payment Order shall be issued by the Director of Pension and Provident Fund and Group Insurance. 9. The authority shall disburse the arrears of the petitioner in terms of the said refixation. 3
10.
Steps shall be taken in the matter at the earliest but positively within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. All payments shall be made positively within a period of four months from the date of refixation. 11. The writ petition stands disposed of. 12. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 13. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of all requisite formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)