Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4892 (AP)

M. Suresh Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal

WP/1301/2017 · 2026-07-08

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 09.07.2026 Date of uploading : 13.07.2026 APHC010067572017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 9th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1301/2017 Between: 1. M. SURESH KUMAR, S/O M.SEETARAMAIAH, RESIDING AT D.N0:4-1 /15, P.NO 186103, MANIKONDA COLONY, PUPPALAGUDA, HYDERABAD 500089. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, (ENDOWMENTS), A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRAPRADESH 3. EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, SWAMY DEVASTHANAM, ANNAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the order Notice Dt:22/12/2016 issued by the 3rd respondent, without taking into consideration of the explanation offered to the notice dated 1/1/2016, without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary exercise of power, violative of principles of natural justice and unconstitutional and consequently to set aside the Notice Dt:22/12/2016 issued by the 3rd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 307 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated: 06.01.2017 in WP No.1301/2017 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 1444 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3rd respondents not to interfere 2 with the business of the petitioner in running the Sub-Canteen at Sri Veera Venkata Satyanarayana swamy Devasthanam, Annavaram, East Godavari Dist, Andhra Pradesh by duly suspending the Notice Dt: 22/12/2016 issued by the 3rd respondent and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to restore the water and electricity supply pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. E VENKATA SIDDHARTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.1301 of 2017 ORDER: Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 09.07.2026 KBN Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 25 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 1301 of 2017 Date: 09.07.2026 KBN