Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48910 (CAL)

SAPTARSHI BISHNU v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/22986/2026 · 2026-10-14

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14/10 2026 AD/03/18 266312 NANDY (DNP) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/22986/2026 DR. SAPTARSHI BISHNU VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Sankha Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Manujendra Narayan Roy, Advocate Mr. Gourav Haldar, Advocate Mr. Biswarup Nandy, Advocate ……for the Petitioner 1. As submitted by Mr. Roy, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, the instant writ- petition has become infructuous in view of the acceptance of the resignation of the petitioner during the pendency of the writ-petition. 2. A copy of the letter of acceptance as well as the written instruction is kept with the record. 3. In view thereof, WPA/22986/2026 is dismissed as not pressed. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2