Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6071 MFA No. 5351 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5351 OF 2019 (CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
M/S SREENIVASA ENTERPRISES REP BY THE MANAGING PARTNERS SRI K R RAVISHANKAR & SMT ANITHA RAVISHANKAR VITTOBHA TEMPLE STREET DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU DISTRICT
2.
SRI K R RAVISHANKAR S/O K C RUDRE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS MANAGING PARTNER, M/S SREENIVASA ENTERPRISES C/O URVASHI THEATRE NO.K-40, H SIDDAIAH ROAD BENGALURU - 560027
3.
SMT ANITHA RAVISHANKAR W/O SRI K R RAVISHANKAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS MANAGING PARTNER, C/O M/S SREENIVASA ENTERPRISES C/O URVASHI THEATRE NO.K-40, H SIDDAIAH ROAD BENGALURU - 560027 …APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. H R ANANTHAKRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6071 MFA No. 5351 of 2019
AND:
1.
SRI B V NARAYAN S/O LATE B R VENAKATARAMANA SETTY AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS R/AT NO 100/24, 10TH D MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560011
2.
SRI B V CHANDRASEKAR S/O LATE B R VENKATARAMANA SETTY AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/AT NO 100/24, 10TH D MAIN ROAD, 1 BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560011 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K.R.NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. V VISWANATH SETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(s) READ WITH SECTION 104 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER:
ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.H.R.Ananthakrishna Murthy., counsel for the appellants has appeared through video conferencing.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6071 MFA No. 5351 of 2019
Sri.K.R.Nagaraja., counsel on behalf of Sri.V.Viswanath Setty., for respondents 1 and 2 has appeared in person.
Counsel for the appellants submits that the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the appellants submits that a conscious decision is taken about infructuous of the appeal.
The oral submission is placed on record. The Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73