Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4890 (ORI)

PANCHANAN SAHU v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/1064/2026 · 2026-01-13

B P Routray

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1064 of 2026 Panchanan Sahu …. Petitioner Mr. T. Nayak, Advocate on behalf of Ms. M. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. T.K. Dash, A.G.A. CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 13.01.2026 Order No. 01. 1. Heard Mr. T. Nayak, learned counsel on behalf of Ms. M. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. T.K. Dash, learned Additional Government Advocate for State-Opposite Parties. 2. Considering the limited grievance of the Petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission granting liberty to him to participate in L.E. Case No.438 of 2024 pending before the Tahasildar, Baliapal (Opposite Party No.4) and said encroachment case may be disposed of, in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, within a period of two months from today. Till such decision is taken by the Tahasildar, the Petitioner may not be evicted from the case land. 3. An urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( B.P. Routray) Judge B.K. Barik