- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2322 CRL.A No. 1591 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No. 1592 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1591 OF 2017 (A) C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1592 OF 2017 (A) IN CRL.A No. 1591/2017: BETWEEN: SRI R NANJUNDA GOWDA S/O K.M.RAMAIAH, R/AT, NO.21, 4TH BLOCK, 7TH CROSS, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. R.BHADRINATH, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.SHILPA GUPTA W/O HIMANSHU GUPTA, NO.65, LAUGHING WATERS, RAMAGONDANA HALLI, WHITE FIELD, BENGALURU - 66. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.A.SOMANNA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2322 CRL.A No. 1591 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No. 1592 of 2017 THIS CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 07.04.2017 PASSED BY THE XV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.1974 OF 2016 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT. IN CRL.A NO. 1592/2017: BETWEEN: SRI R NANJUNDA GOWDA S/O K.M.RAMAIAH, R/AT, NO.21, 4TH BLOCK, 7TH CROSS, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560034. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. R.BHADRINATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S VISHNU FLOUR MILLS NO.4, 10TH "A" MAIN, 1ST CROSS, PARALLEL TO 100 FEET ROAD , INDIRANAGAR, 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 038. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR.HIMANSHU GUPTA, ALSO AT: NO.77, HOPE FARM, ABOVE CORPORATION BANK, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 66. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2322 CRL.A No. 1591 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No. 1592 of 2017 2. MR HIMANSHU GUPTA MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.VISHNU FLOUR MILLS, R/AT NO.65, LAUGHING WATERS, RAMAGONDANAHALLI, WHITE FIELD, BENGALURU - 66. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.A.SOMANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; Notice to R1 is served and unrepresented) THIS CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 07.04.2017 PASSED BY THE XV A.C.M.M., BENGALURU CITY IN C.C.NO.1975/2016 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I.ACT. THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL JUDGMENT 1. These appeals are filed by the appellant/ complainant being aggrieved by the Judgment of acquittal dated 07.04.2017 passed in C.C.No.1974 of 2016 and C.C.No.1975 of 2016 by the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru City (for short "the Trial Court"). - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2322 CRL.A No. 1591 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No. 1592 of 2017 2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CELESTIUM FINANCIAL Vs. A GNANASEKARAN ETC., reported in 2025 SCC ONLINE SC 1320, at paragraph 10 of the judgment, has observed as under: "10. As already noted, the proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C., was inserted in the statue book only with effect from 31.12.2009. The object and reason for such insertion must be realised and must be given its full effect to by a court. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold that the victim of an offence has the right to prefer an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C., irrespective of whether he is a complainant or not. Even if the victim of an offence is a complainant, he can still proceed under the proviso to Section 372 and need not advert to sub-section (4) of Section 378 of Cr.P.C." 3. In the light of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's recent clarification of the legal position, it is now evident that the appellant, being the complainant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is also entitled to file an appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court before the Sessions Court, since he is - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2322 CRL.A No. 1591 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No. 1592 of 2017 considered to be a victim. If this Court were to proceed to hear and decide these appeals at this stage, it could deprive the parties of an available forum, i.e. this Court, for further challenge. 4. Similar view has been taken by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in CHARBEL INDIA Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH reported in 2025 SCC ONLINE AP 2815; by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in MANORAMA KANKANE Vs. NARENDRA KUMAR SHUKLA rendered in Criminal Appeal No.5910 of 2025 decided on 03rd July, 2025; and in the case of LATE KISAN SEWA KENDRA Vs. PRITAM SINGH reported in 2025 SCC ONLINE MP 4818; and in SMT. URMIT MADRAH v. SAMARPAN JAIN rendered Criminal Appeal No. 11872 of 2022 decided on 21st July, 2025; the decision of High Court of Chattisgarh in NEELAM SAHU v. NARADNAGWANSHI rendered in ACQA No. 340 of 2018 decided on 16th July, 2025; and in SMT.KIRTI KURIAN Vs. AJAY SINGH rendered in ACQA No.198 of 2019 decided on 16th July, 2025; the Judgment of this - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2322 CRL.A No. 1591 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No. 1592 of 2017 Court in the case of SIDAGONDAPPA Vs. SHAFI AHAMAD rendered in Crl.A.No.20021 of 2018 decided on 31st July, 2025 and in SRI.T.H.LENKAPPA Vs. SRI SANJAY AND ANOTHER rendered in Criminal Appeal No.146 of 2015 decided on 23rd July, 2025; the decision of High Court of Delhi in the case of D.K. ASSOCIATES Vs.. SHANKAR AND ANOTHER rendered in Criminal Appeal No.694 of 2016 decided on 13th November, 2025 and the decision rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/S. ANANYA ENTERPRISES Vs. SRI G.S. GOPALAKRISHNA rendered in Criminal Appeal No.100171 of 2016 decided on 24th November, 2025. An overall assessment of the aforestated decisions reveals that the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CELESTIUM FINANCIAL (supra) has been relied upon by this Court, as well as other High Courts across the country. 5. Considering the above, it is deemed fit that these appeals be transferred to the concerned Appellate - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2322 CRL.A No. 1591 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No. 1592 of 2017 Court of Sessions and be considered as an appeal under the proviso to Section 413 of BNSS, 2023 (formerly Section 372 of Cr.P.C.,) and numbered accordingly. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following: O R D E R i. Registry is directed to transfer the entire record of the case, including the requisitioned copies of the Trial Court Records, to the concerned Principal District & Sessions Judge, who may assign it to the concerned Appellate Court having the jurisdiction and for which purpose, it would be listed before the Principal District & Sessions Judge; ii. The concerned transferee court is directed to issue Court notice to both the parties to appear before the concerned Court, and the concerned Court, thereafter, shall proceed with the case in accordance with law; iii. In case there are applications pending for condonation of delay or any other pending applications, the same also be transferred to be considered by the learned Judge of transferee Court, in accordance with law; - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2322 CRL.A No. 1591 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No. 1592 of 2017 iv. Considering the matter has been pending for considerable time, the Appellate Court is requested to make an endeavour to dispose of the matters as expeditiously as possible; v. The appellant is permitted to carry out necessary amendment in the cause-title and also the provisions thereof; vi. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations as to the merits of the case and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be agitated before the Court concerned. 6. In the light of the above observation and directions, appeals stand disposed of. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41