- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5826 WP No. 19090 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 19090 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SURAKSHA J D/O. SRI. N. JAYARAMAN, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 2. SRI. VAISHAK. GOWDA J S/O. SRI. JAYARAMAN, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/A. NO.565/7 V MAIN, IX CROSS, BACKSIDE OF HOPCOMS SADASHIVANAGAR, BANGALORE 80. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.S.KANNUR, SENIOR COUNSEL APPEARING FOR; SRI. VACHAN.B ,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NAGAMMA D/O. GURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 2. SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR S/O. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 3. SRI. PREMKUMAR S/O. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R1 TO R3 ARE R/AT. Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5826 WP No. 19090 of 2025 MARGONDANAHALLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DIST- 560036. 4. SRI. B. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O. S. BAYANNA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 5. SRI. B. BHASKAR S/O. S. BAYANNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 6. SRI. B. SATHISH S/O. S. BAYANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R4 TO R6 ARE R/A. NO.90 V MAIN, CHINNAYYANAPALYA BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE – 560027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHRIDHAR PRABHU.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; V/O DATED; 03.11.2025 NOTICE TO R4 TO R6 IS D/W) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE JUDGEMENT DTD. 29.04.2025 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT ANEKAL IN O.S.NO. 130/2024 PRODUCED AS ANNX-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioners seek the following reliefs: “(a) Quash the Judgment dated 29.04.2025 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, at Anekal in O.S.No.130/2024 produced as Annexure-A; - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5826 WP No. 19090 of 2025 (b) Cost/s of the petition; (c) Grant such other relief/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and perused the material on record. 3. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: “MEMO The Petitioner above named humbly submits that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the case with liberty to approach the jurisdictional court to seek appropriate relief/s available in law in the interest of justice and equity.” 4. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to take recourse to such remedies as available in law. It is needless to state that in the event the petitioners avail such remedies and - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5826 WP No. 19090 of 2025 initiate appropriate proceedings, the respondents would be entitled to contest such proceedings in accordance with law. 6. All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter between the parties are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the merits/demerits of the rival contentions. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27