- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3986 RSA No. 1016 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1016 OF 2025 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. RANJITHA S W/O.MOHAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.2368/2, KANTHARAJA URS ROAD, K.G.KOPPALU, MYSURU-570 014 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. N.KUMAR, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. M.R SHANKAR @ SHANKAREGOWDA S/O. LATE RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SRI.S.ASHOK S/O.M.R.SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.344, MARATIKYATHANAHALLI VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT-570 008 3. SRI.R.VEERESH, S/O.B.S.RAJASHEKAR, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3986 RSA No. 1016 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.4, LINGAIAH COLONY, NAZARBAD, MYSURU-570 010 4. SMT.CHANCHALA W/O.SHANKARA @ SHANKAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.344, MARATIKYATHANAHALLI VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT-570 008 5. SRI. RAMU S/O.LATE RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT MARATIKYATHANAHALLI VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT-570 008 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.03.2025 PASSED IN RA.NO.256/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.02.2020 PASSED IN OS.NO.674/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU, AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3986 RSA No. 1016 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 80