- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5970 WP No. 17773 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 17773 OF 2022 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: VAZEER SAHEB T S/O LATE. TAJ AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O NO.11, 4TH CROSS, HSR 7TH SECTOR, OPP. TO SALARPURIA SERENITY, BOMMANAHALLI POST, BANGALORE - 560 068. ALSO AT C/O TAJ AHMED NO.13, CHIKKA VADAGERE, KANNAMANGALA, BENGALURU (R) 561 203. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHAIKH SAOUD, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP) BENGALURU - 560 002. 2. THE REVENUE OFFICER SRI. K. R. MARKET. B.B.M.P. OFFICE, BENGALURU - 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 FO THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING FOR A SUITABLE DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOT A SHOP OF SUITABLE DIMENSION IN THE NEW BUILDING OF SRI Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5970 WP No. 17773 of 2022 KRISHNARAJENDARA MARKET, BANGALORE CITY OR ANY OTHER MARKET OF BBMP AT BENGALURU CITY BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 09.06.2022 OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNX-F. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i) A suitable direction may pleased be issued to the respondents to allot a shop of suitable dimension in the new building of Sri. Krishnarajendra Market, Bangalore city or any other market of BBMP at Bengaluru city by considering the representation dated 09-06-2022 of the petitioner at Annexure-F in the interest of justice and equity. ii) Any other relief deemed fit by this Hon'ble High Court may also be awarded. ii) The cost of the proceedings may pleased be awarded in the interest of justice. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5970 WP No. 17773 of 2022 2. The above matter had been dismissed once earlier for non-prosecution. Subsequently by condoning delay of 762 days, the recalling application came to be allowed. Thereafter, the petitioner has continued to be absent. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting matter. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GSS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2