Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
1
In the High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side 14.10.2026 Item No.69 Court No.21 MKP WPA/25464/2026 NUR ALI SK VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Mr. Abhijeet Chatterjee, Mr. Abdul Amanulla Khan, Ms. Saniya Khatun.
…….… for the Petitioner
Ms. Anamika Pandey. ……for the E.C.I.
1. Affidavit of service filed be kept with the record.
2. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that the prayer for enlisting the name of the petitioner has once been considered by the said Tribunal and has been rejected.
3. He further submits that he intends to have the same reconsidered by the Tribunal with liberty to produce further document/documents, if any.
4. Heard the learned advocates representing the petitioner and the Election Commission of India, considering the fact that once the said Tribunal has heard the petitioner and has rejected the same and there being the prayer for reconsideration by the said SIR Tribunal, in such circumstance, the SIR Tribunal is requested to reconsider petition and the petitioner may be granted liberty to appear physically and to file additional documents if any, required.
5. The petitioner has the EPIC No.KVQ2333904.
6. This Court has not gone into the merit of the case.
2
2
7. In view of the aforementioned discussion, the concerned Tribunal is requested to reconsider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner as early as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of communication of this order to the Tribunal.
8. WPA 25464 of 2026 is disposed of.
9. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)