Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4448 RSA No. 1166 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1166 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
K N MUDDAPPA S/O LATE K N NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT SULUGODU BELELE VILLAGE PONNAMPET NAD VIRAJPET TALUK KODAGU- 571218 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SACHIN B S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
SMT P A SUBBAMMA W/O AIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT DECHOOR MADIKERI - 571201 …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.04.2024 PASSED IN R.A.NO.5028/2019 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KODAGU-MADIKERI THEREBY DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY APPELLANT AND CONFIRMING JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.05.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.86/2012 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, VIRAJPET AND ETC.,
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4448 RSA No. 1166 of 2024
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 33