DESHRAJ SINGH S/O SHRI ANOOP SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4505/2026 · 2026-03-25
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4886 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4886 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12541] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4505/2026 Deshraj Singh S/o Shri Anoop Singh, R/o Khedi Devisingh, Police Station Nadabi District Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana District Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 25/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.253/2009 registered at Police Station Uchain, District-Bharatpur for offences under Section 382 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and that the matter pertains to a case of bail jump. It is further submitted that when the petitioner failed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 27.09.2010, his bail bonds were forfeited and an arrest warrant was issued against him. Subsequently, the accused-petitioner was arrested on 23.02.2023 in pursuance of the said arrest warrant and is in judicial custody since then. The petitioner could not
[2026:RJ-JP:12541] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4505/2026] appear before the Trial Court because he was out of the State for his livelihood, which constitutes a bona fide reason for his non- appearance on the scheduled dates. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Deshraj Singh S/o Shri Anoop Singh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/62