Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4885 (CHH)

SHIVNARAYAN MARKAM v. SUKHBAI JANGDE

MCC/352/2026 · 2026-04-12

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16788 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 352 of 2026  Shivnarayan Markam S/o Late Ramnaresh Markam Aged About 37 Years R/o Kukdur Tahsil Pandariya Distt. Kabirdham C.G. ... Applicant versus 1. Sukhbai Jangde W/o Deepak Jangde Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Birkona Tahsil Pandariya Distt. Kabirdham C.G. 2. Jyoti Jangde D/o Deepak Jangde Aged About 12 Years Minors Through Their Natural Guardian Resp. No. 1, R/o Village Birkona Tahsil Pandariya Distt. Kabirdham C.G. 3. Raj Jangde S/o Deepak Jangde Aged About 11 Years Minors Through Their Natural Guardian Resp. No. 1, R/o Village Birkona Tahsil Pandariya Distt. Kabirdham C.G. 4. Chand Kumar Jangde S/o Deepak Jangde Aged About 6 Years Minors Through Their Natural Guardian Resp. No. 1, R/o Village Birkona Tahsil Pandariya Distt. Kabirdham C.G. 5. Amma Bai Jangde W/o Shobharam Jangde Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Birkona Tahsil Pandariya Distt. Kabirdham C.G. 6. Shobharam Jangde S/o Baliram Jangde Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Birkona Tahsil Pandariya Distt. Kabirdham C.G. 7. Manoj Kumar Shyam S/o Santram Shyam Aged About 24 Years R/o Tikrapara Lakhnapur P.S. Kukdur Distt. Kabirdham C.G. (Non-Applicant No. 1, Driver Of The Offending Vehicle) 8. Makhan Singh Markam S/o Late Motilal Markam Caste Gond R/o Magarwada Post Baijalpur P.S. Taregaon Jungle Tahsil Bodla Distt. Kabirdham C.G. (Non-Applicant No. 13/owner And The Possession Holder Of The Vehicle) ... Non-Applicant(s) For Applicant : Mr. Vijay Shankar Mishra, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.04.13 14:09:42 +0530 2 13.04 .2026 1. Heard on an application for restoration of MAC No. 898 of 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that one week’s time was granted to the applicant to rectify the defects pointed out by the Registry, but due to inadvertence, the order could not be complied with and by virtue of peremptory order passed in MAC No. 898 of 2024, said appeal was dismissed. He would pray to condone the delay and allow the application for restoration. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration submission advanced by Mr. Mishra and reasons assigned in the application, delay of 307 days is hereby condoned and MAC No. 898 of 2024 is restored to its original number. 5. Accordingly, instant MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant