Milu Kumar Bisoyi v. State Rep By its The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/17737/2026 · 2026-07-09
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48848 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48848 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 17737 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 17737 of 2026 Milu Kumar Bisoyi S/o.Santhosh Kumar Bisoyi, No.0, Nuansahi, Khairaputi, Gangapur Taluk, Ganjam District, Odissa-761 123. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By its The Inspector of Police Sunguvarchatram Police Station, Kancheepuram District. Crime No.0067 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer
: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 483 of BNSS, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner/accused no.2 on bail in Crime No.0067 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police, and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Sharon For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.03.2026 for the alleged offence under 8 (c) read with 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29(1) of the NDPS Act 1985, in Crime No.0067 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17737 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, along with other accused, was found to be in illegal possession of 33.170 kgs of ganja. Hence, this case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this is the second bail application filed by the petitioner, as the earlier bail application was dismissed on the ground that the quantity of contraband involved is commercial quantity. He further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 27.03.2026 and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) strongly opposed the bail application on the ground that this Court on 10.06.2026 has dismissed the earlier bail application after considering all the contentions put forth by the
learned counsel for the petitioner. He further submitted that there are no changes in the circumstances. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.
5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17737 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); it is seen that this is a case of commercial quantity and the bail application of this petitioner was earlier dismissed on 10.06.2026 and the petitioner could not submit any ground to deviate from the earlier finding, thus this Court is of the view that there is no change in circumstances, hence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 09-07-2026 DRL To 1.The Inspector of Police C2.Sunguvarchatram Police Station, Kancheepuram District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17737 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 17737 of 2026 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis