Murugesan v. State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/17203/2026 · 2026-07-06
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48846 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48846 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 17203 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 17203 of 2026 Murugesan S/o. Ganesan, No.1/112, Maniyakkara Street, Kondakuppam, Vellore District. ..Petitioner Vs State Rep By, The Inspector of Police SIPCOT Police Station, Ranipet District. Crime No. 179 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.179 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police and pass such other orders deems fit and proper for the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.N.Arunkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Palanivel, Government Advocate, (Crl.Side)
ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 303(2) and 326(a) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.179 of 2026, on the file https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17203 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was involved in the illegal transportation of one unit of river sand in a Tractor without any valid permission. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has nine previous cases pending against him. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the
learned counsel on either side.
6. From the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), it is seen that the petitioner has nine previous cases, which clearly https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17203 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 demonstrates that the petitioner has misused the liberty granted by this Court and subverts the course of justice by repeatedly committing the similar offences. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 06-07-2026 Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MFA To
1. The Inspector of Police SIPCOT Police Station, Ranipet District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17203 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MFA CRL OP No. 17203 of 2026 06-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis