Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48840 (KAR)

SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI v. SMT. PUTTAMMA

MFA/7584/2019 · 2026-02-04

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6567 MFA No. 7584 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7584 OF 2019 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O. M. BALAKRISH REDDY AGED 68 YEARS RESIDING AT SAKKANAHALLI FARM HOUSE MAGONDI POST-563 116 BANGARAPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT …APPELLANT (ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O. LATE VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS 2. SRI V. GOPALAKRISHNA S/O. LATE VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.577 LAKSHMINARAYANA NILAYA 1ST CROSS, THIMMAREDDY COLONY JEEVAN BHIMA NAGAR BENGALURU-560 075 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHREEVARA B. J., ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHENNAKESHAVA B. S., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6567 MFA No. 7584 of 2019 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT The name of the appellant is called out twice in the open Court. There is no representation either through video conferencing or personally. The appellant has not engaged the service of an advocate. Sri.Shreevara B.J., counsel on behalf of Sri.Chennakeshava B.S., for caveator / respondent No.1 appeared in person. 3. It is noted that the appellant was represented by a counsel, viz., Sri.J.G.Chandra Mohan. In view of his demise, the co-ordinate Bench directed the Registry to issue Court notice to the appellant. Accordingly, the Registry concerned has issued notice to the appellant and she has received the notice. However, despite the service of notice, the appellant has not engaged the services of an advocate nor she has appeared as a - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6567 MFA No. 7584 of 2019 party in-person. As already noted above, her name is called out twice in the open Court, there is no representation. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33