Prem kumar v. State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/16999/2026 · 2026-07-08
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48838 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48838 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 16999 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 16999 of 2026 Prem kumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. State represented by, Inspector of Police, Tiruppur City, South Police Station, Tiruppur.
2. Muthulingam ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in respect of the Crime No.399 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Tiruppur South Police Station and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Shanmugam For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), For R1 ORDER The prayer in this Criminal Original Petition is to quash the FIR in Crime No.399 of 2025 as against the petitioner, accused No.5 alone, on the ground of compromise. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16999 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. Upon considering the allegations in the FIR, it can be seen that the son of the de facto complainant was involved in the construction work. While so, he fell down from the scaffolding and was seriously injured and is undergoing protracted treatment.
3. The contention of the parties is that the petitioner/accused No.5 is not the principal employer or the employer. The petitioner is only a manpower agent and only supplied man power to the other accused. Even then, it is stated that the accused No.5 has borne Hospital expenses so far and taking care of the injured person. The de facto complainant, who is the father of the injured person, has come before this Court and submitted that only the petitioner alone is taking care of his son so far. Therefore, he does not want to pursue the criminal case as against the petitioner.
4. In view thereof, FIR in Crime No.399 of 2025 shall stand quashed as against the petitioner alone. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. 08-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No PVS https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16999 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To
1. The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur City, South Police Station, Tiruppur.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16999 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. PVS CRL OP No. 16999 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis