Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1462 RSA No. 1429 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1429 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN:
K GANESH R SHENOY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE K RAMACHANDRA SHENOY R/AT DOOR NO 4-253 SRI RAMPRASAD SVS TEMPLE ROAD KOTE VILLAGE KATAPADI - 574 105 UDUPI DISTRICT …APPELLANT [BY SRI SUDESH KUMAR ACHARYA U, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND:
1.
SAKU @ VASUDHA P PAI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS W/O B PRABHAKARA PAI SYNDICATE BANK 1ST FLOOR, PARKALA - 576 119 HERGA VILLAGE UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT.
2.
2a
MOHINI ALIAS PADMA G PRABHU SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS
RENUKA NAYAK AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O KESHAVA NAYAL D/O LATE MOHINI @ PADMA G PRABHU R/AT NO 22, 16TH CROSS, 33RD MAIN
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1462 RSA No. 1429 of 2023
6TH PHASE, BANGALORE 560 016.
3.
ROOPA PRABHU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O NARAHARI PRABHU D/O LATE MOHINI @ PADMA G PRABHU R/A NO 22, 16TH CROSS 33RD MAIN, 6TH PHASE BANGALORE - 560 016.
4.
SUVARNI @ GEETHA V R MALLYA AGED 72 YEARS W/O U V R MALLYA R/AT LAXMEENDRANGAR KUNJIBETTU, UDUPI 576 102.
5.
K SHALINI SHENOY AGED 63 YEARS D/O LATE K RAMANCHANDRA SHENOY W/O S PRABHU R/AT NEAR CSI HOSPITAL 1ST MAIN, MISSION COMPOUND HOTEL JEWEL ROCK ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA 550 111.
6.
JAYANTHI SHENOY W/O LATE JAGGANATHA SHENOY AGED 65 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO 1718/44/E4P SHETRUJIN LAYOUT BRINDAVAN ROAD, K P BADAVANE DAVANAGERE 577 002.
7. JYOTHI AGED 40 YEARS W/O SATHYANANDA NAYAK R/AT VINAYA, DOOR NO 4/517 TAMPI CAMUPS ROAD SHANTHINAGAR, MANIPAL 574 104.
8.
JAYASHREE SHENOY AGED 38 YEARS D/O LATE K JAGANNATHA SHENOY R/AT DOOR NO 1718/44/E4P
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1462 RSA No. 1429 of 2023
SHETRUJIN LAYOUT BRINDAVAN ROAD K P BADAVANE DAVANAGERE 577 002. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.04.2023 PASSED IN RA.NO.
12/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, UDUPI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 16.06.2016 PASSED IN FDP NO.18/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, UDUPI ALLOWING THE PETITION.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for IV time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13