Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48820 (CAL)

NURJAHAN BEGUM @ DULALI MISTRY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/25866/2026 · 2026-10-13

Supratim Bhattacharya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13.10.2026 Ct. no. 21 SL. 315 Samarpita In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/25866/2026 NURJAHAN BEGUM @ DULALI MISTRY VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS Mr. Sayed Shahid Imam, Mr. Mohammad Khairul .. for the Petitioner Ms. Anamika Pandey, .. for ECI Mr. Pronay Basak .. for the State 1. Affidavit of service has been filed today is taken on record. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition seeking direction upon the SIR Tribunal to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner. 3. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having EPIC No. NUM2410637 has preferred an appeal against deletion of his/her name in the SIR process before the designated Appellate Tribunal. 4. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he/she is seeking early disposal of the proceeding pending before the Tribunal. 5. Considered the submission of the learned advocate in view of the above the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order to the Tribunal. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the case. 2 7. Accordingly, WPA 25866 of 2026 is disposed of. 8. There shall be no order as to cost. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)