Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4882 (AP)

SMT.PYDI BHARATHI v. KAKUTURU RAMI REDDY

TRCMP/40/2024 · 2026-07-09

A Hari Haranadha Sarma

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010078922024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 40/2024 Between: 1. SMT.PYDI BHARATHI, W/O KUKUTURU RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. CONSTABLE IN VILLAGE SECRETARIAT, BINGINASPALLI VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KAKUTURU RAMI REDDY, s/o Ramalinga Reddy, aged about 40 years, r/o Pidathapoluru village Muthukur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ...RESPONDENT Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased topleased to withdraw H.M.O.P.No. 53 of 2023 now pending on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore and transfer the same to the court of learned Senior Civil Judge at Kandukur, Prakasam District, having competent jurisdiction to try the same.. In the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in H.M.O.P.No. 53 of 2023 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, pending disposal of the main transfer petition, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SYED GHOUSE BASHA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. C SUBODH The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Tr.C.M.P.No.40 of 2024 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that H.M.O.P.No.56 of 2023, sought to be transferred, has been disposed of. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition. 2. Considering the representation of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J Date:10.07.2026 Knr 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Tr.C.M.P.No.40 of 2024 10th July, 2026 Knr