Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48817 (CAL)

GAFUR MONDAL @ GOFFUR AND ORS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/2262/2026 · 2026-10-15

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 D/L 24 15.10.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.33 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 2262 of 2026 Gafur Mondal @ Goffur & Ors. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out of Krishnaganj Police Station Case No. 382 of 2023 dated 24.09.2023 under Sections 498A/306/34 of the IPC. And In the matter of : Gafur Mondal @ Goffur & Ors. …Petitioners. Mr. Prabir Majumder Ms. Anindita Kundu …for the Petitioners Mr. Amit Halder Ms. Shayani Sachin Basu …for the State 1. The learned Advocate representing the petitioners submitted the petitioners are the father-in-law, mother-in- law and the brother-in-law of the deceased victim. Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 had been in custody for 128 days and the petitioner no. 3 had been in custody for 196 days. The learned Advocate representing the petitioner submits that petitioners to have been falsely implicated and seeks for prayer for bail. 2. The learned Advocate representing the State opposed the prayer for bail as one of the accused person is still absconding. The charge-sheet in the instant case has been filed on 08.08.2024. The statements recorded under 2 Section 161 and 164 of Cr.P.C are generally omnibus in nature as far as these present petitioners are concerned. 3. The prayer for bail in the instant case is considered and allowed. 4. Accordingly, Petitioners, namely, 1. Gafur Mondal @ Goffur 2. Chhibara Bibi Mondal 3. Budo Mondal shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadia, Krishnagar. 5. The petitioners shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission from the same and the petitioners shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition the petitioners shall meet with the Officer-in-Charge of the local Police Station once a week until further orders. 6. In the event the petitioners fails to appear before the trial Court without justifiable cause, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel their bail automatically without reference to this Court. 7. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2262 of 2026 is allowed. 8. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. 3 9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)