Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4881 (GUJ)

KANTIBHAI KHIMJIBHAI KARGATHIYA v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.MA/1485/2026 · 2026-01-22

P M Raval

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 1481 of 2026 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/1659/2026 With R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 1485 of 2026 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 2382 of 2026 ================================================= KANTIBHAI KHIMJIBHAI KARGATHIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ================================================= Appearance: MR P S DATTA(11324) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ================================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL Date : 22/01/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. By these applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 183 and 179 days respectively, caused in filing the captioned revision applications. 2. Learned advocate Mr. Kushal A. Desai appears and states that he has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No. 2 – original complainant. He shall file his Vakalatnama before the registry, p. 2 which the registry shall accept. 3. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates for the respective respondents waive service. 4. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties. The learned advocate for the applicant, while drawing attention of the Court to the grounds for delay, stated that the matter is amicably settled between the parties, to which assertion, the learned advocate for the respondent No. 2 has fairly conceded to. Accordingly, it is urged that delay caused in preferring the revision applications may be condoned. 5. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of applications, and the fact that the matter is settled between the parties, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision applications has been sufficiently explained. The applications, therefore, succeed and are, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision applications is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/3-4tss22126