Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48805 (KAR)

RAVEESHAIAH K S v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/7182/2024 · 2026-01-09

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1441 CRL.P No. 7182 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7182 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. RAVEESHAIAH K. S., AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O LATE SHIVANNA, OCC: EMPLOYEE, R/O KATTEGOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 120. 2. SMT. RUDRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, W/O RAVEESHAIAH K. S., OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O KATTEGOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 120. 3. ROHITH K. R., AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, W/O RAVEESHAIAH K. S., OCC: EMPLOYEE, R/O KATTEGOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 120. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. D.G.CHINNAPPA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1441 CRL.P No. 7182 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HEBBUR POLICE STATION, KYATHASANDRA CIRCLE, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 120. (REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BENGALURU – 560 001) 2. SMT. MANGALAMMA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, W/O NAGARAJAIAH G. S., OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O KATTEGOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 120. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1; R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR IN CR.NO.30/2024 OF HEBBUR P.S., KYATHASANDRA CIRCLE, TUMKURU DISTRICT, REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 323, 354, 504, 506(B) R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL CJ(JD) AND 5th JMFC, TUMKUR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1441 CRL.P No. 7182 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the Criminal Petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWN The counsel for the above named petitioners is herewith prays that, this Hon’ble court be pleased to dismissed the petition as withdrawn, as the in the above crime investigation is completed and charge is also filed, and petitioners are challenged charge sheet, in the interest of justice.” In terms of memo, the Criminal Petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5