Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48795 (KAR)

SRI. GOVINDA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19616/2024 · 2026-01-30

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5371 WP No. 19616 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 19616 OF 2024 (EXCISE) BETWEEN: SRI. GOVINDA S/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE VIA POST, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN CODE-562109. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANNABASAIAH G.M., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-500 001. REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE RAMANAGARA, NEAR GOVERNMENT COMPLEX, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN CODE-562159. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE, RAMANAGARA DIVISION, RAYARADODDI, KASABA HOBI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN CODE-562109. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5371 WP No. 19616 of 2024 4. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR, RAMANAGARA RANGE, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN CODE-562159. 5. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE PANCHAYATH, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT, PIN CODE-562109. 6. VENKATESH S/O LATE NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT, PIN CODE-562109. 7. BALAJI BAR AND RESTAURANT, REP. BY IT'S PROPRIETOR SMT. VIMALA A., W/O V.RAMESH AGED MAJOR RESIDING NO.25/7, 25/8, MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN CODE-562109 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH B., AGA FO R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5371 WP No. 19616 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petition was listed on 28.01.2026. On that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7