HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37672 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhishek Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed to quash the order dated 6.8.2026 passed in Session Trial No. 832 of 2017, arising out of case crime No. 346 of 2017, under Sections 363, 366, 376, I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Police Station Govind Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 25, Kanpur Nagar, whereby Non Bailable Warrant has been issued against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was on bail at the time of issuing of Non-Bailable Warrant. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the position of law. It is settled position of law that N.B.W. should be issued as a last resort after the litigant fails to respond the notices/summons and bailable warrant. It is further submitted that non-bailable warrant has been issued without issuing any summon and bailable warrant. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application. This is a case related to personal liberty of the present applicant, due to this reason, hearing of opposite party No. 2 is dispensed with. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Naveen Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi .....Applicant(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against applicant shall be kept in abeyance. September 9, 2026 T. Sinha NA528 No. 37672 of 2026 2 (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad