Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48780 (CAL)

GOLAK ROY @ GOLOCK ROY v. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER HOWRAH AND ORS

WPA/26809/2022 · 2026-10-07

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1 07.10.2026 Item No.24 Court No. 30 Aloke WPA 26809 of 2022 Golak Roy @ Golock Roy -vs- The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Howrah & Ors. Mr. Rananeesh Guha Thakurta (through VC) Ms. Senjuti Sengupta Mr. Rijuan Mandal … for the Petitioner Mr. Satyendra Agarwal Mr.Goutam Malik Mr. P. Prasad … for the respondent no. 1/ RPFC Ms. Amrita Pandey Mr. Ghanshyam Pandey … for the Delta Ltd. 1. Mr. Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the Provident Fund Authority submits that the amount received by the RPF Authority has been disbursed on prorata basis. 2. It appears from an order dated 18th January, 2023 that the petitioner has been paid provident fund by the private respondent. 3. It is now submitted by Ms. Banerjee that the petitioner is also getting his pension as the matter has been processed. 4. It has further submitted that the petitioner has till date not updated his KYC. 2 2 5. Accordingly, petitioner is directed to take necessary steps to update his KYC. 6. It is submitted by the respondent authorities that as the provident fund amount has been paid by the private respondent when it was due, and no specific calculation of interest has been provided by the petitioner, the petitioner’s claim is to be treated as fully settled. 7. In view of the said fact and circumstances, the writ application is disposed of. 8. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of. 9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)