SANDEEP JAKHAR S/O SHRI HIMAAT SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/667/2020 · 2026-03-13
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4878 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4878 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10718] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.667/2020 Sandeep Jakhar S/o Shri Himaat Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 17-Shiv Nagar-II Murlipura Scheme Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary (Home) Secretariat Jaipur
2. Police Commissioner, Jaipur Metropolitan.
3. Deputy Commissioner Police (West), Jaipur Metropolitan
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Murlipura Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Bhumika Goyal Ms. Anshu Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/03/2026
1. The instant criminal writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is humbly prayed that this criminal writ petition be accepted and by appropriate writ or order, respondents may be directed not to open history sheet of the petitioner and the direction Annexure 5 and 6 may kindly be set asided. Any other direction or order, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
[2026:RJ-JP:10718] (2 of 2) [CRLW-667/2020]
2. By way of filing this criminal writ petition, a prayer has been sought against the respondents not to open the history sheet against the petitioner pursuant to the orders dated 19.02.2020 and 20.02.2020 issued by Police Commissioner, Jaipur.
3. At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court that as per the reply submitted by the State, it has been mentioned in the reply that looking to the aforementioned facts and circumstances as well as detailed submissions and the provisions of the Rules as well as the Act, the present criminal writ petition is pre-mature at this stage, as no history sheet is opened against the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that no cause of action has arisen with the petitioner to file instant criminal writ petition. Hence, this petition is liable to be rejected by treating the same as pre-mature.
4. Considering the above submissions made by learned Public Prosecutor, the instant criminal writ petition is dismissed as pre- mature granting liberty to the petitioner to move an application for revival of this criminal writ petition, in case, any adverse order is passed against the petitioner.
5. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/42