2026:UHC:24-DB 1 HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE MR. G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 0 2 ND JANUARY, 2 0 2 6 W RI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) NO.1 06 6 OF 2 0 2 5 M/ s Mansha Stone Crusher ...Petitioner. Ver su s Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax, Dehradun and others. ….Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Tarun Pande and Mr. Ashish Agarwal, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondents : Mr. Harsh Rautela, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the respondents. JUDGMENT :(per Mr . G. Nar en dar , C.J.) Learned counsel for the parties submit that the instant writ petition could be disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 24.02.2025, rendered in Writ Petition (M/ B) No. 39 of 2025, which reads as under: “Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand through video conferencing. 3. Petitioner is a taxable person, registered under GST Act, 2017. His GST registration has been cancelled by Assistant Commissioner, Haridwar-Sector 3 vide order dated 12.03.2024. Challenging the cancellation order, petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 4. The show cause notice issued to the petitioner on 23.02.2024 reveals that cancellation has been ordered on account of petitioner’s failure to furnish GST returns for prescribed period. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon a judgment rendered by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (M/ S) No. 3283 of 2024, whereby, petitioner in that case was permitted to make application for revocation of the cancellation order and the Competent Authority was directed to consider the application and pass 2026:UHC:24-DB 2 appropriate order as per law, within four weeks thereafter. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a similar order be passed in the present case also. 7. Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder submits that she has no objection if petitioner is permitted to move appropriate application for revocation of cancellation order. 8. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to move an application for revocation of the cancellation order. If he makes such application within two weeks from today and also furnishes all the pending returns and deposits unpaid tax along with interest and amount of penalty, the Competent Authority shall consider the petitioner’s prayer for revocation as per law within four weeks from the date of receipt of such application.” 2. The submission of both the counsels is placed on record. 3. The instant Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of relief granted in Paragraph No. 8 of the judgment dated 24.02.2025, rendered in Writ Petition (M/ B) No. 39 of 2025. 4. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dt: 02nd January, 2026 Rathour PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd13323779d9e3aeb 1097d17dbb53d481cabd25946eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92A40CC617 9B8E010331BA695239171F906FD5C45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2026.01.06 10:50:55 +05'30'