Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48738 (CAL)

DILIP KAYAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/30569/2024 · 2026-10-07

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1 07.10.2026 Item No.33 Court No. 30 Aloke WPA 30569 of 2024 Dilip Kayal -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Tauhid Khan Mr. Atanu Halder … for the petitioner Ms. Aparna Banerjee … for the P.F. Authority Ms. Amrita Pandey Mr. Ghanshyam Pandey … for the Delta Ltd. 1. On hearing the learned counsels for the parties and on considering the submissions made by Ms. Banerjee appearing for the P.F. Authority wherein she submits that the petitioner has already receiving pension. 2. It is further submitted that the provident fund amount has also been allotted in favour of the petitioner/claimant on prorata basis but the same could not be handed over to the petitioner as no online claim application has been submitted by the petitioner. 3. Petitioner is thus at liberty to submit the online claim application and receive the amount from the P.F. Authorities. 2 2 4. It is submitted by the respondent authorities that as the provident fund amount has been paid by the private respondent when it was due, and no specific calculation of interest has been provided by the petitioner, the petitioner’s claim is to be treated as fully settled. 5. In view of the said fact and circumstances, the writ application is disposed of. 6. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of. 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)