Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4871 (JHR)

SHAMIM AKHTAR @ MD SHAMIM AKHTAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./34/2026 · 2026-04-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:9548] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.34 of 2026 ------ Shamim Akhtar @ Md Shamim Akhtar aged about 29 years S/o Rafique Ahamad, At present R/o Shahid Chowk, P.O. + P.S. Patratu, Dist- Ramgarh. Permanent Residence of Chandlaso, PO- Hanina, PS- Huru, District- Lohardaga, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Imran Ansari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-06-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.79 of 2020 registered under Sections 385/387 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was the member of the banned organization- P.L.F.I. and he along with the co-accused created havoc in Patratu and surrounding areas and extorted money from the contractors and companies in the name of P.L.F.I. Organization. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Pawan Kuamr Das; who has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 10.12.2020 passed in B.A. No.9435 of 2020. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.11.2025 as has been mentioned in para-08 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.79 of 2020 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-06.04.2026-Animesh/