- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3422 WP No. 19292 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 19292 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. MUTHUSWAMY, S/O LATE PALANISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, EARLIER R/AT #63, 7TH MAIN, 3RD PHASE, J P NAGAR BENGALURU – 560 078 NOW R/A FLAT NO.204, FLAMINGO VILLAMENTS 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, SOUTH AVENUE LAYOUT, GOTTIGERE BENGALURU – 560 083. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.N.BASAVARAJU., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: M/S ENTERPRISES SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS LAB NO.437 & 438, JUMMA MASJID ROAD (OPH ROAD), SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI. ABBAS ALI BOHRA S/O LATE TAYAB ALI BOHRA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT # 1109/3, 47TH CROSS 5TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA BENGALURU – 560 041. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SANJAY H SETHIYA., ADVOCATE) - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3422 WP No. 19292 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2020 PASSED BY THE LEARNED I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, ON I.A. NO.8 IN O.S.NO.1212/2021 AS PER ANNEXURE-G AND ETC THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER 1. On the last date of hearing, after hearing the parties, this Court had passed the following order: “1. Aftersome arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will take instructions to withdraw the case. However, since his vakalath is not on record, he needs some time. 2. Let an appropriate application/memo be filed within a week. 3. List on 20.01.2026. 4. Interim order granted earlier is extended till the next date of hearing.” 2. The memo/application has not been filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that she has not received any memo either. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3422 WP No. 19292 of 2021 4. None appears for the petitioner despite the matter being called out twice. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE YN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA