Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48691 (KAR)

SMT. SHANTHI XAVIER v. SRI MOHAMMEDKALEEM AGHA

CRP/485/2024 · 2026-02-02

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5871 CRP No. 485 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 485 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHANTHI XAVIER W/O. LATE SAGAYARAJ XAVIER, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SMT. MARY JENIFAR D/O. LATE SAGAYARAJ XAVIER, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 3. SRI. JACK PAUL S/O. LATE SAGAYARAJ XAVIER, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF NO. 8, 2ND MAIN ROAD, S.K. GARDEN, BENSON TOWN POST, BENGALURU-560 046. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMESHA K R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI MOHAMMEDKALEEM AGHA S/O. LATE ABDUL SYED AGHA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5871 CRP No. 485 of 2024 2. SMT. TAHERA SULTANA W/O. MOHAMMEDKALEEM AGHA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/A NO. 33/15, THILAKANAGAR MAIN ROAD, S.R.K. GARDEN, BENGALURU-560 041. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.04.2024 PASSED ON IA IN OS NO. 25581/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE LXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH 75), MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU DISMISSING IA FILED U/O 7 RULE 11(d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 22.01.2026 the following order was passed: “Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners. Even on the previous occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Re-list this matter on 02.02.2026. If there is no representation for the petitioners on the next date of hearing, the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5871 CRP No. 485 of 2024 petition will be dismissed for non- prosecution. Re-list this matter on 02.02.2026.” 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT: JL