- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1461 RSA No. 1399 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1399 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUJATHA W/O LATE K PRAKASH BABU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. SRI SRINIVAS PRASAD S/O LATE K PRAKASH BABU AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS BOTH ARE R/A "BHAVANI HOUSE", BENGRE ROAD, PADUBIDRI UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS [BY SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. SMT. PRATHIMA N ACHAR W/O LATE NARASIMHA ACHAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS EMPLOYEE POSTAL DEPARTMENT (RMS) UDUPI - 576 101. 2. SYNDICATE BANK REP BY GENERAL MANAGER PERSONAL DEPARTMENT SYNDICATE BANK(HO), MANIPAL UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1461 RSA No. 1399 of 2023 3. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA A STATUTORY BOADY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION ACT, 1956 REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER DIVISIONAL OFFICE, UDUPI DIVISION HAVING ITS OFFICE AT "JEEVAN KRISHNA" AJJARKAD, UDUPI-576 101 UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. 4. SYNDICATE BANK MALPE BRANCH REP BY THE BRANCH MANAGER SYNDICATE BANK, MALPE BRANCH UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA FILED UNDER SEC. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.04.2023 PASSED IN RA.No.04/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, UDUPI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.09.2018 PASSED IN OS No.19/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, UDUPI. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1461 RSA No. 1399 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for IV time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12