06.10.2026 Serial no. 43 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (NDPS) 2030 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Hili PS Case No. 263 of 2025 dated 20.12.2025 u/s 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A/28/29 of the NDPS Act [NDPSCase No. 94 of 2025]. -And- In the matter of : Suman Das @ Soumen … … Petitioner(s) Ms. Busra Khatun … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, ld. APP Ms. Samira Grewal Mr. Chandra Gupta Kamal … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 21.12.2025 on the alleged recovery of 55 bottles of phensedyl and charge-sheet has already been submitted. State opposes the prayer for bail. The records of the case reflect that the prosecution intends to rely upon 17 witnesses in order to prove its case. Having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner and the time which will be consumed to take the trial to its logical conclusion as also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents of the present petitioner, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Suman Das @ Soumen shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court (NDPS Act), 3rd Court, Balurghat, Dakhin Dinajpur. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned Special court/trial court and shall not leave the district of Dakhin Dinajpur without prior permission of the learned Special court/trial court or the court in seisin of the case. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 2030 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered as final opinion on the merits of the case. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. 3 Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)