Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4867 (KAR)

PRAKASH J v. THE SENIOR MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

WP/17056/2021 · 2026-03-17

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15676 WP No. 17056 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 17056 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: PRAKASH J S/O JAGANNATH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.290C, 12TH LOOP ROAD IDEAL HOME TOWNSHIP BENGALURU SOUTH RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA BENGALURU - 560 098 &PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.N. BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SENIOR MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK (FORMERLY UNITED BANK OF INDIA) BENGALURU CONTONMENT BRANCH NO.40/2, BRIGADE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 011 2. THE ZONAL OFFICE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK KARNATAKA ZONAL OFFICE RAHEJA TOWER M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 REP BY ITS Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15676 WP No. 17056 of 2021 ASST GENERAL MANAGER 3. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK (FORMERLY UNITED BANK OF INDIA) UNITED TOWER NO.11, HEMANTA BASUSARANI DALH OUSIE KOLKATA - 700 001 REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER 4. RECOVERY OFFICER DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-2 LIC JEEVAN MANGAL BUILDING 2ND FLOOR, NO.4 RESIDENCY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 025 &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S. SUDHARSAN, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK TO REFUND THE AMOUNT OF RS.1,62,000,00 (RUPEES ONE CRORE SIXTY TWO LAKHS) WHICH INCLUDED THE BID AMOUNT WHICH WAS PAID AS PER THE E-AUCTION DTD 24.09.2019 AND AS WELL AS REGISTRATION CHARGE ALONG WITH THE INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 18 PERCENT P.A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15676 WP No. 17056 of 2021 ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that, as per the instructions of the petitioner, he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7