Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48666 (KAR)

SMT. MEHARUN BI v. MALLIK BURAN

RSA/952/2025 · 2026-01-22

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3969 RSA No. 952 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 952 OF 2025 (DEC/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MEHARUN BI W/O RASOOL SAB, AGED 90 YEARS, 2. KHASIM SAB S/O LATE RASOOL SAB AGE 64 YEARS, 3. AZGAR ALI S/O LATE RASOOL SAB AGE 61 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST 4. ABBAS ALI S/O LATE RASOOL SAB AGE 61 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST 5. BUDEN SAB S/O LATE RASOOL SAB AGE 56 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST 6. SHABBIR S/O LATE RASOOL SAB AGE 54 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST 7. SIDDIQUE S/O LATE RASOOL SAB AGE 53 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3969 RSA No. 952 of 2025 8. HYDER ALI S/O LATE RASOOL SAB AGE 50 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST ALL ARE R/O TADASA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATI TALUK - 577 235. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA, ADV. [ABSENT]) AND: 1. MALLIK BURAN S/O SYED SAB AGED 34 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O TADASA VILLAGE BHADRAVATI TALUK - 577 235. 2. AMEENABI W/O LATE SYED SAB AGED 54 YEARS AGRICULTURIST 3. RASOOL SAB S/O LATE SYED SAB AGED 53 YEARS 4. MUMTAZBI D/O LATE SYED SAB AGED 52 YEARS 5. JOHARBI D/O LATE SYED SAB AGED 55 YEARS ALL ARE R/O TADASA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATI TALUK - 577 235. 6. NASIR MALLIK S/O LATE SYED SAB AGED 54 YEARS, RESIDENT OF NO. 9, PUTTAMMA LAYOUT BEHIND FARIDA SHOE FACTORY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3969 RSA No. 952 of 2025 GOVINDAPURA, A.C. POST BENGALURU - 560 045. 7. USMAN ALI SON OF LATE SYED SAB AGED 59 YEARS, AGRICULTURISTS RESIDENT OF TADASA VILLAGE BHADRAVATI TALUK - 577 235. 8. SHAHTAJ D/O LATE SYED SAB R/O TADASA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATI TALLUK - 577 235. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.02.2025 PASSED IN RA NO.5040/2021 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA, SITTING AT BHADRAVATHI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.07.2018 PASSED IN OS NO.228/2007 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3969 RSA No. 952 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 47