Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48664 (MAD)

The Director v. M.Natarajan

CMP(MD)/5579/2026 · 2026-07-03

C V Karthikeyan, R Sakthivel

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP.(MD)Nos.5579 & 5580 of 2026 in WA.(MD)SR.Nos.17935 & 17936 of 2026 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J These petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 213 days and 224 days respectively in filing the Writ Appeals against the order dated 20.01.2025 made in W.P(MD)Nos.5930 of 2009 & 1440 of 2015. 2.In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that the delay occurred owing to administrative reasons and on account of the transfer of the concerned Assistant Superintendent. 3.Notice had been ordered and duly served. The learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of the first respondent and opposed the 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis petition for condonation of delay. However, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is only appropriate that the appeals be heard on merits. 4.Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and these petitions are allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeals if it are otherwise in order. When the appeals are listed for admission, the name of the learned counsel, who appeared for the first respondent, to be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K.,J) & (R.S.V.,J) 03.07.2026 gns 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J gns CMP.(MD)Nos.5579 & 5580 of 2026 in WA.(MD)SR.Nos.17935 & 17936 of 2026 03.07.2026 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis