Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48660 (CAL)

ANITYA DAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/2101/2026 · 2026-10-09

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.10.2026 cm/s das ct 33 C.R.M. (M) 2101 of 2026 sl no.41 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Raiganj P.S. Case No. 1117 of 2025 dated 09.05.2025 Sections 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Allowed In Re : Anitya Das. ….. petitioner Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhuri Mr. Kunal Ganguly …… for the petitioner Mr. Anamitra Banerjee Ms. Priyanka Bhattacharyya …… for the State 1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner referred to an order dated 23rd December, 2025 whereby the coordinate Bench of this Court had granted liberty to seek for renewal the prayer for bail after recording the evidence of CSW 10, CSW 11, CSW 12 and CSW 13. The learned advocate representing the petitioner has placed certified copy of the evidence, recording in the context of the aforesaid charge-sheet witnesses. Let the same be kept on record. 3. Considering the evidence of CSWs to have been recorded in compliance with the order dated 23rd December, 2025 passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court, further custody of the petitioner is not required in the instant case and the prayer for bail of the petitioner is considered and allowed. 4. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raiganj, Uttar Dinajpur on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition petitioner shall meet the local police station once in a week until further orders. 5. In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court. 6. The application being CRM(M) No. 2101 of 2026 is disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)