Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4865 (PNJ)

VIDYAWATI v. DR. PRIYANKA SONI

COCP/1366/2026 · 2026-03-30

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-1366 IN THE HI 108 Vidyawati Dr. Priyanka CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW another’ wh direction:- 2. respondent bearing No. Haryana’. It 1366-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o Versus iyanka Soni M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Sukhdev Raj Kamboj, Advo Ms. Ambika Luthra, Addl. A.G I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 14.05.2025 (Annex CWP-13828-2025, titled as ‘Vidya whereby the writ petition was dis “xxx xxx 5. Accordingly, with the without commenting upon the m writ petition is disposed of with No.2-Director, Women and Ch Haryana to decide the claim present writ petition by treating and to pass a speaking and r accordance with law within a p date of receipt of a certified co present petition along with acco It is, inter alia, submitted dent-State that the petitioner herein w g No. CWP-18041-2020 titled as . It is submitted in any event orde ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1366-2026 Date of Decision: 30.03.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA j, Advocate for the petitioner. l. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Vidyawati vs. State of Haryana and as disposed of with the following xxx the consent of the parties and the merits of the case, the present with a direction to the respondent Child Development Department, im raised by the petitioner in the ating the same as a representation nd reasoned order thereupon in a period of four months from the d copy of this order and a copy of accompanying Annexures.” itted by learned counsel for the rein was not a party in writ petition d as ‘Sudesh Malik vs. State of nt order dated 27.03.2026 has been ging Writ and ing nd nt nt nt, he on in he of the ition of een RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.01 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1366 passed by th been allowe have been gr 3. taken on reco for the petiti 4. submissions only notiona admitted by was not a pa No. CWP-18 that he may the petitione 5. 6. required to dismissed a aforesaid O 7. 8. 30.03.2026 rishu 1366-2026 -2- by the respondent wherein the claim llowed; and same pay scale along w een granted to the petitioner. Copy of Order dated 27.03.20 on record. A copy thereof, has also bee petitioner. Learned counsel for the peti ssions of learned counsel for the respo otional pay scale has been granted to ed by learned counsel for the petitio ot a party before the Writ Court in the 18041-2020. Further, learned cou e may be permitted to withdraw the p oner to challenge the Order dated 27 Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present pe ssed as withdrawn, with liberty to Order dated 27.03.2026, in accorda Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable e claim made by the petitioner has ong with all consequential benefits .03.2026 handed over in Court is lso been supplied to learned counsel e petitioner refutes the aforesaid e respondent-State and submits that ted to the petitioner. It is, however, petitioner that the petitioner herein in the aforesaid writ petition baring d counsel for the petitioner submits the present petition with liberty to ated 27.03.2026. above, no further orders are nt petition; and the same stands rty to the petitioner challenge the ccordance with law. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No has efits rt is nsel said that ver, rein ring mits y to are ands the RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.01 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.