Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3873 RPFC No. 104 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 104 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
B.M. VIJAYAKUMAR S/O B.S. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS WORKING AS TECHNICIAN HAL, BANGALORE R/AT NO. 952, 2ND CROSS SVG NAGAR, MUDALAPALYA - 560 072
CORRECT ADDRESS RESIDING AT NO. 52, 2ND CROSS, SVG NAGAR, MUDALAPALYA - 560 072.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJU C.N, ADVOCATE AND SRI. MADHUKAR, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3873 RPFC No. 104 of 2021
AND:
SMT. S. LAKSHMI W/O B.M. VIJAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT 29, SIT EXTENSION BEHIND MUSLIM HOSTEL TUMKUR - 572 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. BOPANNA B, ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT. AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT DATED 23.07.2021 PASSED IN C.MISC.No.6/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT TUMKURU ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF CR.PC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3873 RPFC No. 104 of 2021
ORAL ORDER Sri Raju C. N learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and therefore the revision petition in RPFC No.104/2021 does not survive for consideration. Memo to that effect is also filed.
2. No representation on respondent's side on call.
3. Having considered the submission that is made by Sri. Raju C. N, permission as prayed for is accorded. Thus, RPFC No. 104/2021 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE
VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21