Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
31 06.10.2026 Ct. No.17 J.Das FA 43 of 2019
Satish Agrawal Vs. Veena Agrawal & Ors.
Mr. Shyamal Sarkar Mr. Probal Kr. Mukherjee Mr. Suhrid Sur
…For the appellant
Mr. Debanik Banerjee
…For the respondent nos.1, 2, 6 to 9
Mr. Rudradeb Chaudhuri
Mr. Samriddha Sen
Ms. Saolini Bose
Ms. Srija Chakraborty
…For the respondent nos.3 & 4
1. This is an appeal preferred against a judgment and decree dated 5 December 2017 passed by the Learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 10th Court, Alipore, District - 24 Parganas in Title Suit No.23 of
2010.
2. The suit is one for partition. All the parties are members of one Agrawal/Agarwala family.
3. The matter has been repeatedly adjourned. It is submitted on behalf of all the parties that during the pendency of this appeal, the parties had entered into a Terms of Settlement. A copy of the Terms of Settlement alongwith the sketch plan pertaining to the premises no.16/3, Hindustan Road, Kolkata – 700029 be kept with the records. The terms have been duly signed by all the parties.
4. It is submitted on behalf of all the respective Advocates that the Terms of Settlement reflect the true and correct intention of the parties. In view of
2
the Terms of Settlement, nothing survives in this appeal. FA 43 of 2019 stands disposed of. Let the Terms of Settlement be treated as the part of the decree. The impugned decree stands modified in terms of the Terms of Settlement.
5. The Department is directed to take necessary steps for drawing up, completing and finalising the decree as modified by the Terms of Settlement filed in Court.
[Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.]
[Atarup Banerjee, J.]