Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48632 (CAL)

DEBANAN PORE @ DEBANAN POREY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/2036/2026 · 2026-10-09

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.10.2026 cm/sdas ct 33 C.R.M. (M) 2036 of 2026 sl no.23 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 / under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Pro edure, 1973 in connection with Bishnupur P.S. Case No. 239 of 2022 dated 16.04.2022 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allowed In Re : Debanan Pore @ Debanan Porey ….. petitioner Mr. Deepak Prahladka Mr. Sarfaraz Hossain Ms. Reshmi Khatun …… for the petitioner Mr. Kallol Mondal, learned PP Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta Mr. Sreyash Kumar Singh …… for the State 1. Heard the submissions of the learned Advocates representing the respective parties. 2. Out of 37 witnesses, 15 witnesses have been examined including the de facto complaint and two of the eye-witnesses. The petitioner is in custody for the past four years. The concerned Court being Additional District and Sessions Judge, 7th court, Alipore, South 24-Pargnas, had been lying vacant since May, 2026 and no further recording of evidence of the prosecution witnesses progressed since February 11, 2026. 3. Considering the period of detention of the petitioner and also the examination of the prosecution witnesses to be held immediately to be remote, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is considered and allowed. 2 4. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and shall visit the local police station once in a week until further orders. 5. In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court. 6. The application being CRM(M) No. 2036 of 2026 is allowed and disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)