IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 668 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 672 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 673 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 674 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 676 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 678 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 680 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 681 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 682 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 684 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 685 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 687 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 688 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 689 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 690 of 2026 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 692 of 2026 ============================================= RANIBEN RANCHHODBHAI SHIYALIYA & ORS. Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ============================================= Appearance: MR BM MANGUKIYA(437) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4 MS BELA A PRAJAPATI(1946) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4 MR ANGESH A PANCHAL, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4,6 ============================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI p. 2 Date : 16/01/2026 ORAL COMMON ORDER 1. Heard Mr. B.M. Mangukiya, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners. 2. The matter is mentioned and requested to be taken up for hearing wherein, it is stated by Mr. B.M. Mangukiya, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners that the respondent authorities are in process of demolition of the premises in possession of the petitioners without issuance of any notice by any provision of law. 3. Mr. Devendra Navinchandra Vyas, I/c. Mamlatdar, Chotila, is present before the Court and submits that no action is taken by the respondent authority with respect to demolition of the premises neither any notice is issued for demolition. 4. In light of such statement made by Mr. Devendra Navinchandra Vyas, I/c. Mamlatdar, Chotila, who is present before the Court, respondent No.4 herein, in absence of any demolition, the present petition is disposed of. 5. Mr. Mangukiya, learned advocate appearing for the p. 3 petitioners submits that the respondent authorities to act in accordance with the mandate of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Writ Petition (Civil) 295 of 2022. Needless to say that the respondent authorities to act in accordance with law and following the cardinal principles of natural justice. Direct service today is permitted. (VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J) NEHA