- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3838 CRP No. 218 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.218 OF 2018 (RES) BETWEEN: SRI. DORESWAMY S/O.SURADAYA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT KADAKOLA VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK-571311. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. D L SURESH., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. S VASANTHA KUMARI D/O.LATE D.SHIVAMALLU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.89, NGO COLONY, RAJENDRANAGAR, N.R.MOHALLA, MYSURU. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P NATARAJU., ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.01.2018, PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU IN M.A.NO.01/2016 AND THE ORDER DATED 16.11.2015 PASSED IN MIS.NO.63/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT MYSURU IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3838 CRP No. 218 of 2018 THIS CRP, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: Set aside the judgment dated 19.01.2018 passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Mysuru in M.A.No.01/2016 and the order dated 16.11.2015 passed in Mis No.63/2010 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Mysuru in the interest of justice and equity. 2. A compromise petition had been filed which was recorded by this Court vide its order dated 27.06.2024. There being certain obligations to be fulfilled by both the parties, the matter was being adjourned from time to time. 3. Today, a memo has been filed by the counsel for respondent enclosing a possession letter. In terms thereof, it is stated that respondent has taken possession of the suit schedule property post the execution of sale deed by the petitioner in favour of respondent. The payments, which were required to - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3838 CRP No. 218 of 2018 be made, have been made by respondent to the petitioner, which has been recorded from time to time in the order sheet of this case. 4. In that view of the matter, the obligations of the petitioner towards the respondent and the obligations of the respondent towards the petitioner in terms of the aforesaid compromise having been completed, the petition stands disposed taking on record that the sale has been executed by the petitioner in favour of the respondent. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43