- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2615 WP No. 16459 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 16459 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. RAGHU G R AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O GUDDADARANGAIYA, RESIDING AT NO.4012, 10TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND BLOCK, K.S. LAYOUT(ISRO), BENGALURU - 560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISHA A.S, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SMT. ASHA V.G, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, D/O LATE GUDDEGOWDA, RESIDING AT NO.20, Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2615 WP No. 16459 of 2023 VARADAHALLI, GALAGA POST, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 216. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 03/07/2023 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, IN M.C.NO. 2492/2020 ON IA NO. 3, VIDE PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2615 WP No. 16459 of 2023 ORAL ORDER No representation on petitioner's side on call. 2. As per the material available on record, by order dated 20.09.2023 notice was ordered to the respondent. However, the petitioner failed to furnish the requisites. On 04.06.2024 there was no representation. Therefore, the Court ordered to post the matter on 05.06.2024 for dismissal. On 05.06.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to take steps. On 10.06.2024, the petitioner was permitted to take out notice on the learned counsel appearing before the trial Court. However, proof of service was not filed. There was no representation on 22.07.2025. 3. On 24.07.2025, following order was passed:- "Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out hand summons on the counsel appearing for the respondent before the Trial Court and shall file a memo to that effect by 12th August 2025 or else the petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court". - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2615 WP No. 16459 of 2023 4. Neither proof of service is filed nor the petitioner has chosen to represent the matter. All these facts reveals that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17