- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5515 WP No. 18202 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 18202 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. YELLAMMA W/O YOGESH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 2. SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 3. SMT. NAGAMANI W/O RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 4. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O SANNASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 5. RAMASWAMY S/O LATE SANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 6. SMT. VENKATAMMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, 7. LOKESH S/O ANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 8. VENKATAMMA W/O HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 9. SUKANYA W/O RAMESH, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5515 WP No. 18202 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 10. SMT. GIRIJA W/O KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, 11. SMT. GIRIJA W/O SHEKHARA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 12. SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O KARIYAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 13. SMT. PALLAVI W/O KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 14. SMT. BHAGYA W/O YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 15. SMT. KEERTHY W/O SURESH K.K., AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 16. NANJESHA K.S. S/O LATE SANNA JOGI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 17. SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O KALLAIAH JOGI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 18. SMT. MANJAMMA W/O MANJA JOGI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 19. SMT. YELLAMMA W/O BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 20. SWAMY S/O LATE DASAIAH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5515 WP No. 18202 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 21. SMT. GAYATRI P.B. W/O SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 22. SMT. NETRA W/O VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 23. SMT. THOLASI W/O KRISHNA ALIAS VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 24. SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 25. SMT. YELLAMMA W/O GURU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 26. SMT. DIVYA C/O ANNAPPA B.V. AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 27. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI W/O LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 28. SMT. MAMATHA P.S. W/O KUMARA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 29. SMT. NANDITHA W/O RAJESH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 30. SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O SANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, 31. SMT. LAKSHMI W/O RAJAPPA, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5515 WP No. 18202 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDIENT OF HANDIJOGI VEEDI, PERIYAPATNA TOWN, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571107 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA B. HARAVIGOUDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU-571107 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HUNASURU SUB DIVISION, HUNASURU, MYSURU DISTRICT 571105 3. THE TAHASILDAR PERIYAPATNA TALUK, PERIYAPATNA, MYSURU DISTRICT 571107 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 1ST RESPONDENT SHALL CONSIDER REPRESENTATION DATED 05-04-2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-B WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5515 WP No. 18202 of 2025 ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:- i) "Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent shall consider representation dated 05-04-2025 vide Annexure-B with immediate effect. ii) Issue a Writ are order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the circumstance of the case in the interest of justice and equity." 2. By way of the above prayers what the petitioners are seeking for is to provide amenities to the petitioners for their basic necessities. The petitioners are unauthorised occupants of the land in Survey No.322/14 of Periyapatna Village, Periyapatna Taluk, Kasaba Hobli. 3. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners and having gone through the papers, I am of the considered opinion that no such amenities could be directed to be provided to the petitioners when the petitioners are admittedly unauthorised occupants. The land has not been acquired and allotted to the petitioners. The acquisition itself is yet to be completed. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5515 WP No. 18202 of 2025 The unauthorised occupancy cannot be regularised by directing the providing of amenities. 4. In that view of the matter, the petition is disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authorities to firstly, acquire the land, thereafter seek for allotment and then to seek for amenities to be provided. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE MH/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26