KALEEM AHEMAD SALEEM AHMAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS SEC. DEPT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND ORS
WP/10664/2026 · 2026-08-19
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4859 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4859 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
905-WP.10664.2026.odt JVS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10664 OF 2026 Kaleem Ahemad Saleem Ahemad } Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents Mr. Shrirang Katneshwarkar with Mr. Sandeep Gupta, for the Petitioner. Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Additional Government Pleader with Mr. Aditya R. Deolekar, AGP for State.
CORAM :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ. & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
DATE :
19th AUGUST, 2026 P.C.:
1. The Petitioner is the father of a male child born on 15th December, 2013 at Alhera Hospital, Malegaon, District Nashik. The father’s name is Kaleem Ahemad s/o. Saleem Ahemad (the Petitioner). The mother’s name is Misbah Kaleem Ahemad. The child’s name in the birth record is Mohammed Arshan Ahemad Kaleem Ahemad. According to the father/Petitioner, the word ‘Ahemad’ should appear as surname and not as the middle name. According to him, the name of the minor son should be Mohammed Arshan s/o. Kaleem Ahemad. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that even the first name Mohammed Arshan should be reduced to Arshan and the word Mohammed should be removed. 1 JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date: 2026.08.20 11:28:50 +0530
905-WP.10664.2026.odt
2. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim. Considering the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Janabai D/o. Himmatrao Thakur vs. the State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2019 (6) Mh. L. J. 769, we were not inclined to entertain this Petition.
3. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that an application seeking correction in the name is pending with Respondent No.3. Let Respondent No. 3 deal with the said application on its own merits, in the event the said authority is vested with the power to pass orders on such application.
4. With the aforesaid direction, this Petition is disposed off.
[GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE] 2