- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5043 RSA No. 901 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 901 OF 2025 (MON) BETWEEN: R E PARAMESHWARAPPA S/O KARISHAPPA, WRONGLY MENTIONED AS KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, BRICK BUSINESS, R/O RAMPURA VILLAGE, BIRUR HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 133. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SATHEESH H K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI CHANNAKESHAVA INVESTMENTS BALLARY CAMP, BIRUR TOWN, KADUR TALUK, REP BY ITS PARTNER, K.VASUDEVA, S/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O BALLARY CAMP, BIRUR TOWN, KADUR TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 116. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.02.2025 PASSED IN RA NO.69/2021 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KADUR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.09.2021 PASSED IN OS NO.256/2011 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5043 RSA No. 901 of 2025 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 5th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE PSG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 17