Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48583 (MAD)

R.PACHAIYAPPAPILLAI v. THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER

WP/26015/2026 · 2026-07-08

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 26015 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 26015 of 2026 R.Pachaiyappapillai ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Revenue Officer, O/o.District Collectorate, Villupuram District. 2. The Tahsildar, Melmalaiyanur Taluk, Villupuram District. 3. Ellammal ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pass order on the representation dated 16.06.2026 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to cancel the illegal patta issued in favour of the 3rd respondent and restore the same in the petitioner’s name. For Petitioner(s): Ms.N.Deepthi For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachiayappan, Government’s Counsel for R1 & 2 ORDER This writ petition is filed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.06.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26015 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 16.06.2026 before the first respondent, seeking cancellation of patta, which was wrongly issued in favour of the third respondent. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's Counsel takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 & 2 and submitted that the power to cancel a patta is vested with the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO). However, in the case on hand, the petitioner has sent a representation to the District Revenue Officer/first respondent, who lacks authority to order such a cancellation. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Since the cancellation power is vested with the Revenue Divisional Officer, this Court directs the petitioner to make a fresh representation seeking the cancellation of the patta before the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer is directed to dispose of the same, after issuing due notice to the petitioner as well https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26015 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 as the third respondent and other aggrieved parties, if any, within a period of eight (8) weeks thereof. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 08-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The District Revenue Officer, O/o.District Collectorate, Villupuram District. 2. The Tahsildar, Melmalaiyanur Taluk, Villupuram District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26015 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 26015 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis