Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48579 (KAR)

V KARTHIK KUMAR v. SMT S VIJAYAMMA

MFA/6335/2017 · 2026-01-30

Jyoti M

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5374 MFA No. 6335 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6335 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN: V.KARTHIK KUMAR, S/O SRI. S.VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.87/3B, NAGAWARAPALYA, BENNIGANAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK-560016. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VARADARAJAN M.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. S.VIJAYAMMA, W/O. RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT 2ND CROSS, CHINNAPASWAMY LAYOUT, HORAMAVU, BENGALURU-560 043. 2. SMT. S.LALITHA W/O. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, KUMBALAHALLI VILLAGE, SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK-562129. 3. SMT. C.SUNANDA W/O ANNAIAH, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5374 MFA No. 6335 of 2017 AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O 3RD CROSS, NEAR SRI. VIDYANIKETHAN SCHOOL JARAGANAHALLI, KANAKAPURA ROD, BENGALURU-560 062. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL S.REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.M.S.Varadarajan, counsel for the appellant and Sri.Rahul S.Reddy, counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 appeared in person. The appeal is filed to set aside the order dated 13.07.2017 passed by the Court of XII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru on I.A.No.2 in O.S.No.8727 of 2016. After arguing the matter for sometime, counsel appearing for the respective parties jointly submits that - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5374 MFA No. 6335 of 2017 direction may be issued to the Trial Court to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. Taking note of the said submission, appeal is disposed of and a gentle request is made to the Trial Court to dispose of the suit within an outer limit of one year from the receipt of certified copy of the order and without getting influenced by the observation and the findings recorded in the impugned order. With the above observation, the appeal is disposed of. Parties to co-operate for the speedy disposal of the suit. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25